|
Why
Use 4.6mm i.d. Columns?
For
cver twenty years, the most popular analytical HPLC column format
has been the 4.6mm i.d. column. At the time of its introduction,
this choice of a 4.6mm diameter column was dictated mainly by
the limitations of the analytical instrumentation available then.
For
efficient chromatography, the dispersion caused by external instrumentation
must be small relative to the volume of the eluting peaks. One
means of ensuring this, is to increase the effective peak volumes
by increasing the column bore.
However, with the improvements in instrumentation, particularly
in the area of miniaturisation, it is now possible to reduce the
column bore and still maintain the efficiency of the column. This
approach, made possible by the low dispersion characteristics
of modern HPLC instrumentation offers the chromatographer a number
of significant advantages over the use of conventional 4.6mm diameter
columns.
Capital
Narrow Bore Columns
Capital HPLC are able to supply high performance narrow bore columns
of 3.2, 2.1mm and 1.0mm i.d., in a conventional column format,
packed with any of the materials from our vast range.
In addition
to the standard 4.6mm i.d. format, UCC cartridge inserts are available
in both 3.2mm and 2.1mm i.d. formats.
Both the 3.2mm and 2.1mm inserts are fully compatible with the
standard UCC cartridge holder, so it is not necessary to purchase
specific narrow bore holders. At present the UCC range is the
only cartridge system available which supports 2.1mm i.d. inserts.
Capital
Narrow Bore Developers Kit
The narrow bore developer kit consists of one 15cm column of each
of the diameters discussed above, and provides the method developer
with a convenient stepwise route for the scale down of the analysis.
The kit also includes a cartridge holder, a pair of end fittings
and a hexagonal spanner.
Solvent
Consumption
The
use of narrow bore columns leads to a considerable reduction in
solvent consumption.
Figure 1 shows the relative solvent consumption for 4.6, 3.2,
2.1 and 1.0mm i.d. columns or cartridges, it can be seen that
even a moderate reduction in diameter from 4.6 to 3.2 can lead
to a 50% saving in solvent costs. Not only does this save on solvents,
but also on time spent preparing mobile phases and cuts waste
disposal costs. As can be seen from the diagram below, the use
of 1.0mm diameter columns results in a 95% saving in solvent costs.
With such savings in the costs of solvent, it is even possible
to consider the use of more exotic mobile phases containing expensive
additives, such as chiral selectors.
 |
Figure
1
Perhaps
the most dramatic effect of reducing the cartridge diameter
is the increased mass sensitivity. In situations where only
a very small sample volume is available, it is often possible
to obtain a five fold increase in sensitivity by changing
from a traditional 4.6mm cartridge to a 2.1mm i.d.
A twenty fold increase in sensitivity can be acheived by switching
from a 4.6mm to a 1.0mm i.d. column. |
 |
Figure
2 |
 |
Figure
3
Shows
the results obtained by the injection of a dilute sample
of simple hydrocarbons onto 15cm length columns of varying
diameter ranging from 4.6mm down to 1.0mm. In all cases
a fixed volume injection of 1ul was made.
Conditions:
ODS-Hypersil, Column: 10cm ODS Hypersil
Eluent: 70:30 Methanol: Water Injection: 1ul in all cases
1. Benzamide 2. Acetophenone 3. Benzophenone 4. Biphenyl
|
|